Reviewing Our Reviews…Again
I’ve written pieces in the past regarding our album review policy, but the issue has come up yet again. Someone sent me a comment that questioned our reviews here on Galleywinter and said “the next negative review I see on Galleywinter will be the first.” They then listed a dozen or so quotes from various reviews and articles from our site. We’ve obviously made such the impression on this person that they felt the need to dig through our archives and cherry pick select quotes from ten years worth of reviews. Now to the larger point.
Why don’t we do negative reviews?
We try to act like a filter in today’s crowded marketplace. If we dig something enough to write about it, then we hope the brand we’ve established helps you understand it’s something we truly think is worth your time. After you listen, you may disagree, but all we’re attempting to do is stimulate conversation about music we like. Our motto has always been “Supporting music we love.” It doesn’t say anything about ravaging music we hate.
I mean I could tell you that Kristen Kelly’s “Ex Old Man” is recycled trash. That the dated guitar riff sounds like OMD’s “How Bizzare” and her vocals on it screech like nails on a chalkboard. Between screeches it resembles some sort of awkward faux-country female rapping on the verses. Or that Casey Donahew’s Double Wide Dream is a double wide nightmare of cliche-ridden garbage lyrics delivered via nasally vocals that sound like a drunken 18 year old kid that reduces his talented band to a paint by numbers karaoke level of musicianship. What if I told you that Granger Smith’s music reminds me of a Kevin Fowler album that’s been castrated? (ed. note-Granger’s a super nice guy…just needed another example).
Does that make anybody feel better about themselves? Or help you decipher what music you really like?
Ripping apart bad music and albums is redundant, negative and does nobody any good. If you don’t like it, don’t waste your time…move on to something you do like.
Those examples I listed above are having success…playing the Opry, selling out shows, selling tons of albums etc. Tearing them down is a waste of time. People are obviously into it or they wouldn’t be having the success they are finding.
We’d rather not waste our time rehashing why we find that success odd.
Instead, we choose to lift up new stuff that we feel needs lifting (K Phillips, Javi Garcia, or Josh Weathers etc) or offer confirmation that something held in high regard is still pretty awesome (Randy Rogers Band, Wade Bowen, Turnpike Troubadours etc)
So, to review the review policy here at GW. We have always had a review by omission policy. Meaning, we like to accentuate the positive and only focus on the stuff we truly dig. If we review it, it means we think it is special. In our opinion, it does no good to tell you how awful someone’s record is…we’d rather just share the one’s we think are very cool.
Perhaps some sort of rating system like 3 out of 4 rocking horses would help. Maybe we’ll look into that. Also, the reviews we do post aren’t all sunshine and rainbows. We are critical and we do point out the flaws we find in the records we dig. Whether that be a quibble with the production or a question about the songwriting.
For example. The K Phillips record we’re so high on right now included this in its official review:
This is not a perfect record. The lyrics reek of a little too much romantic wanderlust at times, some of the vocals are mumbled slurrily, and at points it all seems intrinsically indulgent.
Right or wrong, that’s just how we’ve chosen to do things.
Positive energy is always more effective than negative.
We offer plenty of dissenting thoughts in our opinion pieces and editorial blogs. Tank, myself and our other contributing writers have plenty of opinions. We invite you to share yours in the comments of our articles, interact with us via Twitter or FB…or our old dinosaurs of social media interaction the fabled Galleywinter forums.
































